Debate contribution: Display of Flags, Emblems and Banners

Debate contribution by Mr Eóin Tennyson on .

MLA
Mr Eóin Tennyson
Party at the time
Alliance Party
Date
30 April 2024
Type
Debate contribution
Business
Private Members' Business
Heading
Display of Flags, Emblems and Banners
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4487451

Read the official Assembly record

Text

I thank the Member for giving way. I note that the comparison to dual-language street signs was made. Does the Member agree that that is a strong point, in that there is a clearly defined process of consultation and application for dual-language street signage and a similar process should apply for the erection of flags?

55 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.22 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.80).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.92).
  • Subject area: Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.08No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.19No
Dog-whistle messaging0.06No
Controversy escalation0.18No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.80Yes
Overall judgement0.22At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.92
Reports or questions it0.07
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.01
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.95
Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy0.04
No identity-related subject0.01
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00
Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 10:02 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification