Topical question AQT 73/22-27

Topical question by Mr Andy Allen MBE on .

MLA
Mr Andy Allen MBE
Party at the time
Ulster Unionist Party
Date
4 March 2024
Type
Topical question
Assembly reference
AQT 73/22-27
Business
Oral Answers to Questions
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4254561

Read the official Assembly record

Text

Mr Allen asked the Minister of Health when he expects to receive instructions from the First Minister and deputy First Minister in relation to orthopaedic services for veterans, given that, in answer to a recently tabled question for written answer, the Minister highlighted that it is the responsibility of the Executive Office to implement the provisions of the Armed Forces Act 2021.

62 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Follow-ups by the same MLA in the Chamber

These were assessed together with this record:

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.07 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.89).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
  • Subject area: Another identity-related subject.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.04No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.02No
Dog-whistle messaging0.02No
Controversy escalation0.04No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.89Yes
Overall judgement0.07At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)1.00
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Another identity-related subject0.40
No identity-related subject0.35
Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits0.12
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.10
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.01

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 09:38 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification