Topical question AQT 6/22-27

Topical question by Mrs Diane Dodds on .

MLA
Mrs Diane Dodds
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
19 February 2024
Type
Topical question
Assembly reference
AQT 6/22-27
Business
Oral Answers to Questions
Assembly identifier
Official Report component 4223191

Read the official Assembly record

Text

Mrs Dodds asked the First Minister and deputy First Minister whether, in the interests of reconciliation, the First Minister will condemn the terrorists in the IRA who were responsible for death and destruction, given that 17 February 1978 is marked by one of the worst IRA atrocities in Northern Ireland, when an incendiary device ripped through the La Mon Hotel, killing 12 people, who were burnt alive, and injuring dozens.

70 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Follow-ups by the same MLA in the Chamber

These were assessed together with this record:

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.50 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • The text criticises or condemns the framing or division (0.47).
  • Subject area: Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism.
  • The overall probability was moderate at most and none of the culture-war criteria was close to being met.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.23No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.06No
Cultural grievance politics0.05No
Dog-whistle messaging0.21No
Controversy escalation0.31No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.22No
Overall judgement0.50Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing0.39
Reports or questions it0.01
Criticises or condemns it (chosen)0.47
Adopts it0.13
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.98
No identity-related subject0.01
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.01
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 09:36 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification