Motion or amendment: Breach of the Ministerial Code of Conduct - Amendment 1

Motion or amendment by Mr Gerry Carroll on .

MLA
Mr Gerry Carroll
Party at the time
People Before Profit Alliance
Date
6 February 2026
Type
Motion or amendment
Business
Motion Amendment · Private Members' Motion · to “Breach of the Ministerial Code of Conduct”
Heading
Breach of the Ministerial Code of Conduct - Amendment 1
Assembly identifier
Document 469995

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

Breach of the Ministerial Code of Conduct - Amendment 1

After 'confidence of this Assembly;' insert:

‘condemns the Minister for his abdication of duty, failure of leadership and stoking the flames of racial tension and violence in Larne, compromising the safety of migrant families seeking refuge in his constituency;’

49 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.30 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • The text criticises or condemns the framing or division (0.93).
  • Subject area: Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.51No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.04No
Cultural grievance politics0.09No
Dog-whistle messaging0.07No
Controversy escalation0.22No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.31No
Overall judgement0.30At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing0.05
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it (chosen)0.93
Adopts it0.01
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers1.00
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00
Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 09:20 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification