Motion or amendment: Delivering a Successful Fleadh - Amendment 1
Motion or amendment by Mr Gerry Carroll on .
- MLA
- Mr Gerry Carroll
- Party at the time
- People Before Profit Alliance
- Date
- 15 January 2026
- Type
- Motion or amendment
- Business
- Motion Amendment · Private Members' Motion · to “Delivering a Successful Fleadh”
- Heading
- Delivering a Successful Fleadh - Amendment 1
- Assembly identifier
- Document 466392
Read the official Assembly record Open Data source
Text
Delivering a Successful Fleadh - Amendment 1
Leave out all after 'mutual understanding;’ and insert:
‘recognises that prior to the commencement of other sporting and cultural events, some accommodation providers have hiked prices to unsustainable levels; and calls on the Executive Office to convene a working group comprising of relevant officials and representatives from the appropriate departments to ensure that the Fleadh is a success, that accommodation costs are not inflated in advance, that suitable accommodation and free public transport is provided for attendees, and that no evictions from non-standard temporary accommodation occur before or during the Fleadh.’
98 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Divisions on this item
- 19 January 2026: Delivering a Successful Fleadh - Amendment 1 – The Amendment Was Therefore Agreed
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not qualifying”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.06 (qualifying needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not qualifying).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.92).
- No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
- Subject area: Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies.
- The overall probability was at or below the not-qualifying threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.04 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.02 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.04 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.02 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.05 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.92 | Yes |
| Overall judgement | 0.06 | At or below not-qualifying threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 1.00 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies | 0.53 |
| No identity-related subject | 0.37 |
| Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy | 0.07 |
| Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers | 0.02 |
| Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues | 0.01 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 09:18 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.