Motion or amendment: Challenging the Harm Posed by the Windsor Framework - Amendment 3

Motion or amendment by Mr Timothy Gaston on .

MLA
Mr Timothy Gaston
Party at the time
Traditional Unionist Voice
Date
13 November 2025
Type
Motion or amendment
Business
Motion Amendment · Private Members' Motion · to “Challenging the Harm Posed by the Windsor Framework”
Heading
Challenging the Harm Posed by the Windsor Framework - Amendment 3
Assembly identifier
Document 458840

Text

Challenging the Harm Posed by the Windsor Framework - Amendment 3

After ‘Northern Ireland's place in the United Kingdom;’ insert:

‘regrets weak unionist leadership acceptance of such tinkering and reaffirms that only the removal of the Windsor Framework can adequately restore Northern Ireland’s place within the United Kingdom;’

48 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not qualifying

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not qualifying”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.49 (qualifying needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not qualifying).
  • Criteria met: Identity framing (0.64).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.85).
  • Subject area: Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty.
  • The overall probability was low and the text did not adopt any identity-based framing.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.64Yes
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.08No
Cultural grievance politics0.05No
Dog-whistle messaging0.20No
Controversy escalation0.32No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.20No
Overall judgement0.49Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.85
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.15
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.99
No identity-related subject0.01
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00
Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 09:17 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification