Motion or amendment: End Israeli Impunity in Gaza - Amendment 2

Motion or amendment by Mr Gerry Carroll on .

MLA
Mr Gerry Carroll
Party at the time
People Before Profit Alliance
Date
20 June 2025
Type
Motion or amendment
Business
Motion Amendment · Private Members' Motion · to “End Israeli Impunity in Gaza”
Heading
End Israeli Impunity in Gaza - Amendment 2
Assembly identifier
Document 444462

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

End Israeli Impunity in Gaza - Amendment 2

Leave out all after ‘state of Palestine;’ and insert:

'further calls on the Minister for the Economy to immediately suspend the transfer of public money from Invest NI to companies manufacturing component parts for F-35 warplanes, until such manufacturing operations have ceased; and calls on the Irish Government to pass and enact the Occupied Territories Bill in full and put an end to the Central Bank of Ireland facilitating the sale of Israel’s war bonds.’

83 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.14 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.76).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.99).
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.06No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.06No
Cultural grievance politics0.02No
Dog-whistle messaging0.08No
Controversy escalation0.10No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.76Yes
Overall judgement0.14At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.99
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.01
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
No identity-related subject0.84
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.08
Another identity-related subject0.06
Religion and belief (including people of no religion), churches, faith communities and religious prejudice (including antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice)0.02
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 09:07 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification