Motion or amendment: Opposing Plans for the Nutrients Action Programme 2026-2029
Motion or amendment by Miss Michelle McIlveen on .
- MLA
- Miss Michelle McIlveen
- Party at the time
- Democratic Unionist Party
- Date
- 27 May 2025
- Type
- Motion or amendment
- Business
- Motion · Private Members' Motion
- Heading
- Opposing Plans for the Nutrients Action Programme 2026-2029
- Assembly identifier
- Document 440829
Read the official Assembly record Open Data source
Text
Opposing Plans for the Nutrients Action Programme 2026-2029
That this Assembly recognises the need to tackle all sources of pollution affecting water quality in Lough Neagh and in rivers throughout Northern Ireland; expresses alarm at plans to impose stricter phosphorus limits on over 3,500 local farms, mandate low emission slurry spreading equipment and require compulsory uncultivated buffer strips for those in the arable and horticulture sectors; believes such measures could devastate agriculture, reduce livestock numbers, add cost and red tape and undermine food security; stresses that any future nutrient management policy, which is focused on more sustainable agricultural practices, must be the product of genuine partnership, rather than punitive policies that risk the viability of our agri-food industry; further stresses the need to redouble efforts, and actions, to address the sources of pollution in wastewater treatment; and calls on the Minister of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs to immediately withdraw the current public consultation on the Nutrients Action Programme 2026-2029 in order to provide time and space to develop a genuinely multi-sectoral and multi-agency approach that is fair and workable for all stakeholders.
183 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Also tabled by
Each MLA who tabled or co-signed this item has their own record:
Divisions on this item
- 10 June 2025: Opposing Plans for the Nutrients Action Programme 2026-2029 – The Motion Was Carried
Assessment
Awaiting analysis
This record has not been analysed yet. It is not counted in any total until it has been assessed.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.