Motion or amendment: Decolonisation of Museum Collections and Repatriation of Artefacts - Amendment 2
Motion or amendment by Mr Gerry Carroll on .
- MLA
- Mr Gerry Carroll
- Party at the time
- People Before Profit Alliance
- Date
- 16 May 2025
- Type
- Motion or amendment
- Business
- Motion Amendment · Private Members' Motion · to “Decolonisation of Museum Collections and Repatriation of Artefacts”
- Heading
- Decolonisation of Museum Collections and Repatriation of Artefacts - Amendment 2
- Assembly identifier
- Document 439856
Read the official Assembly record Open Data source
Text
Decolonisation of Museum Collections and Repatriation of Artefacts - Amendment 2
Leave out all after 'art and artefacts' and insert:
'opposes the misuse of the British Museum Act 1963, which the British Museum uses to justify its refusal to return artefacts to their home countries; calls on the Minister for Communities to support museums in their efforts to decolonise their collections; and further calls on the Minister to work to ensure that stolen art and artefacts are returned to their countries of origin, rather than to the British Museum.'
89 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.17 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.63).
- No identity-based framing was identified (0.86).
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.24 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.05 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.40 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.07 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.27 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.63 | Yes |
| Overall judgement | 0.17 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 0.86 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.02 |
| Adopts it | 0.12 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-related subject | 0.34 |
| Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers | 0.28 |
| Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies | 0.27 |
| Another identity-related subject | 0.08 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.01 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 09:06 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.