Motion or amendment: Delivering an Irish Language Strategy (revised wording) - Amendment 3
Motion or amendment by Mr Gerry Carroll on .
- MLA
- Mr Gerry Carroll
- Party at the time
- People Before Profit Alliance
- Date
- 13 March 2025
- Type
- Motion or amendment
- Business
- Motion Amendment · Private Members' Motion · to “Delivering an Irish Language Strategy (revised wording)”
- Heading
- Delivering an Irish Language Strategy (revised wording) - Amendment 3
- Assembly identifier
- Document 432509
Read the official Assembly record Open Data source
Text
Delivering an Irish Language Strategy (revised wording) - Amendment 3
Leave out all after ‘island’ and insert:
'calls on the Minister of Education to work with Gaelscoil An Lonnáin and other relevant agencies to identify a new site for the school in west Belfast; and further calls on the Minister for Communities to deliver the long overdue Irish Language Strategy.’
60 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.15 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.86).
- No identity-based framing was identified (0.99).
- Subject area: Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy.
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.11 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.02 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.49 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.02 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.12 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.86 | Yes |
| Overall judgement | 0.15 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 0.99 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.01 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy | 1.00 |
| No identity-related subject | 0.00 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
| Parades, bonfires and commemorations | 0.00 |
| Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 09:03 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.