Motion or amendment: Commitment to the Proper Use of Public Monies (Revised Wording) - Amendment 1
Motion or amendment by Mr Gerry Carroll on .
- MLA
- Mr Gerry Carroll
- Party at the time
- People Before Profit Alliance
- Date
- 24 January 2025
- Type
- Motion or amendment
- Business
- Motion Amendment · Private Members' Motion · to “Commitment to the Proper Use of Public Monies (Revised Wording)”
- Heading
- Commitment to the Proper Use of Public Monies (Revised Wording) - Amendment 1
- Assembly identifier
- Document 425040
Read the official Assembly record Open Data source
Text
Commitment to the Proper Use of Public Monies (Revised Wording) - Amendment 1
After 'press officer' insert:
'believes that recent amendments to the Financial Assistance for Political Parties Scheme were an unfortunate exercise in disadvantaging smaller parties, whilst privileging larger parties; recognises that this was an improper and unfair way of allocating money; calls on the Assembly Commission to conduct a review into whether the Financial Assistance for Political Parties Scheme ensures equality of treatment of parties, regardless of the number of Members elected;’
84 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.06 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.86).
- No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.08 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.03 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.02 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.03 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.04 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.86 | Yes |
| Overall judgement | 0.06 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 1.00 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-related subject | 0.99 |
| Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty | 0.01 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
| Parades, bonfires and commemorations | 0.00 |
| Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 09:01 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.