Motion or amendment: Mental Health Provision in Northern Ireland - Amendment 2

Motion or amendment by Mr Timothy Gaston on .

MLA
Mr Timothy Gaston
Party at the time
Traditional Unionist Voice
Date
26 September 2024
Type
Motion or amendment
Business
Motion Amendment · Private Members' Motion · to “Mental Health Provision in Northern Ireland”
Heading
Mental Health Provision in Northern Ireland - Amendment 2
Assembly identifier
Document 411827

Text

Mental Health Provision in Northern Ireland - Amendment 2

At end insert: ‘; and further calls on the Minister to present Treasury with a Troubles related ‘unique need’ mental health Block Grant bid using the framework provided in chapter 3 of the 2010 Final Report of the Independent Commission on Funding and Finance for Wales.’

55 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not qualifying

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not qualifying”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.12 (qualifying needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not qualifying).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.91).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.99).
  • Subject area: Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-qualifying threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.06No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.03No
Dog-whistle messaging0.03No
Controversy escalation0.07No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.91Yes
Overall judgement0.12At or below not-qualifying threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.99
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.01
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.63
Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits0.33
No identity-related subject0.04
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 08:57 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification