Motion or amendment: Relationships and Sexuality Education - Amendment 3

Motion or amendment by Mr Gerry Carroll on .

MLA
Mr Gerry Carroll
Party at the time
People Before Profit Alliance
Date
17 April 2024
Type
Motion or amendment
Business
Motion Amendment · Private Members' Motion · to “Relationships and Sexuality Education”
Heading
Relationships and Sexuality Education - Amendment 3
Assembly identifier
Document 397906

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

Relationships and Sexuality Education - Amendment 3

After ‘women and girls;’ insert: ‘recognises that regressive political forces have used their opposition to evidence-based and age-appropriate Relationships and Sexuality Education to infringe upon the rights of transgender people and those in need of reproductive healthcare;’

44 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.28 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • The text criticises or condemns the framing or division (0.35).
  • Subject area: Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.40No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.09No
Cultural grievance politics0.06No
Dog-whistle messaging0.12No
Controversy escalation0.27No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.56No
Overall judgement0.28At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing0.30
Reports or questions it0.01
Criticises or condemns it (chosen)0.35
Adopts it0.34
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues1.00
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00
Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 08:53 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification