Motion or amendment: Workers' Rights - Amendment 3

Motion or amendment by Mr Gerry Carroll on .

MLA
Mr Gerry Carroll
Party at the time
People Before Profit Alliance
Date
7 March 2024
Type
Motion or amendment
Business
Motion Amendment · Private Members' Motion · to “Workers' Rights”
Heading
Workers' Rights - Amendment 3
Assembly identifier
Document 393134

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

Workers' Rights - Amendment 3

After ‘improving workers’ rights and conditions;’ insert:

‘commends junior doctors in the BMA for taking strike action in pursuit of a pay rise; further recognises that inflation peaked at 11 percent in 2022 and commits to giving all public sector workers a real-terms pay increase;’

50 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.04 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.92).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.04No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.01No
Dog-whistle messaging0.02No
Controversy escalation0.04No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.92Yes
Overall judgement0.04At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)1.00
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
No identity-related subject0.88
Another identity-related subject0.08
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.02
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.02
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 08:52 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification