Motion or amendment: Executive Reform - Amendment 2
Motion or amendment by Mr Gerry Carroll on .
- MLA
- Mr Gerry Carroll
- Party at the time
- People Before Profit Alliance
- Date
- 29 February 2024
- Type
- Motion or amendment
- Business
- Motion Amendment · Private Members' Motion · to “Executive Reform”
- Heading
- Executive Reform - Amendment 2
- Assembly identifier
- Document 391596
Read the official Assembly record Open Data source
Text
Executive Reform - Amendment 2
Leave out all after “veto of a single party;” and insert:
‘recognises that community designations and mechanisms at the Assembly have entrenched divisions in our communities and agrees that they should be scrapped; and calls on the First Minister and deputy First Minister to include a specific commitment to reform the institutions in the Programme for Government.’
62 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.21 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.71).
- No identity-based framing was identified (0.62).
- Subject area: Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations.
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.35 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.05 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.13 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.07 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.19 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.71 | Yes |
| Overall judgement | 0.21 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 0.62 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.33 |
| Adopts it | 0.05 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations | 0.95 |
| Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty | 0.03 |
| Religion and belief (including people of no religion), churches, faith communities and religious prejudice (including antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice) | 0.01 |
| Another identity-related subject | 0.01 |
| No identity-related subject | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 08:51 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.