Oral question AQO 3427/22-27

Oral question by Mrs Pam Cameron on 26 March 2026.

MLA: Mrs Pam Cameron
Party at the time: Democratic Unionist Party
Date: 26 March 2026
Type: Oral question
Assembly reference: AQO 3427/22-27
Department: Department for Communities
Business: To the Minister for Communities
Assembly identifier: Document 478065

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Minister for Communities to outline the key engagements he undertook during his visit to the United States of America over the St Patrick’s Day period.

28 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Follow-ups by the same MLA in the Chamber

These were assessed together with this record:

20 April 2026 – I thank the Minister for that detailed answer and for giving us details on what was clearly a busy and worthwhile visit…

Assessment

Not qualifying

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not qualifying”.

Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.10 (qualifying needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not qualifying).
None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
No identity-based framing was identified (0.98).
The overall probability was at or below the not-qualifying threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
Question	Probability	Met?
Identity framing	0.04	No
Sectarian or communal antagonism	0.01	No
Cultural grievance politics	0.03	No
Dog-whistle messaging	0.02	No
Controversy escalation	0.06	No
Legitimate policy scrutiny	0.34	No
Overall judgement	0.10	At or below not-qualifying threshold

Context and attribution (stance)
Option	Probability
No identity-based framing (chosen)	0.98
Reports or questions it	0.00
Criticises or condemns it	0.00
Adopts it	0.02

Subject area (top five)
Subject	Probability
No identity-related subject	0.47
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials	0.13
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations	0.12
Religion and belief (including people of no religion), churches, faith communities and religious prejudice (including antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice)	0.09
Another identity-related subject	0.09

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 08:35 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification