Oral question AQO 3281/22-27

Oral question by Mr Stephen Dunne on 26 February 2026.

MLA: Mr Stephen Dunne
Party at the time: Democratic Unionist Party
Date: 26 February 2026
Type: Oral question
Assembly reference: AQO 3281/22-27
Department: Northern Ireland Assembly Commission
Business: To the Assembly Commission
Assembly identifier: Document 473546

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Assembly Commission for an update on restoration work to the tomb of Lord and Lady Craigavon.

19 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Follow-ups by the same MLA in the Chamber

These were assessed together with this record:

10 March 2026 – I thank the Member for his answer. I welcome the fact that power washing took place yesterday in advance of this…

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.18 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
No identity-based framing was identified (0.93).
Subject area: Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials.
The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
Question	Probability	Met?
Identity framing	0.05	No
Sectarian or communal antagonism	0.02	No
Cultural grievance politics	0.14	No
Dog-whistle messaging	0.02	No
Controversy escalation	0.17	No
Legitimate policy scrutiny	0.53	No
Overall judgement	0.18	At or below not-flagging threshold

Context and attribution (stance)
Option	Probability
No identity-based framing (chosen)	0.93
Reports or questions it	0.00
Criticises or condemns it	0.00
Adopts it	0.07

Subject area (top five)
Subject	Probability
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials	0.62
No identity-related subject	0.34
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism	0.02
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty	0.01
Another identity-related subject	0.01

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 08:35 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification