Oral question AQO 2213/22-27

Oral question by Mr Justin McNulty on 12 June 2025.

MLA: Mr Justin McNulty
Party at the time: Social Democratic and Labour Party
Date: 12 June 2025
Type: Oral question
Assembly reference: AQO 2213/22-27
Department: Department of Justice
Business: To the Minister of Justice
Assembly identifier: Document 443173

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Minister of Justice to outline any consideration she has given to taking forward Recommendation 15 of the Hate Crime Legislation in Northern Ireland Independent Review report as part of the Justice Bill (NIA Bill 07/22-27).

38 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Follow-ups by the same MLA in the Chamber

These were assessed together with this record:

24 June 2025 – I thank the Minister for her answer. During the past number of weeks, McLaughlin and Harvey has been contracted to…

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.10 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.92).
The text criticises or condemns the framing or division (0.80).
Subject area: Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations.
The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
Question	Probability	Met?
Identity framing	0.07	No
Sectarian or communal antagonism	0.02	No
Cultural grievance politics	0.07	No
Dog-whistle messaging	0.03	No
Controversy escalation	0.08	No
Legitimate policy scrutiny	0.92	Yes
Overall judgement	0.10	At or below not-flagging threshold

Context and attribution (stance)
Option	Probability
No identity-based framing	0.08
Reports or questions it	0.03
Criticises or condemns it (chosen)	0.80
Adopts it	0.09

Subject area (top five)
Subject	Probability
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations	0.98
No identity-related subject	0.02
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials	0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations	0.00
Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy	0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 08:31 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification