Oral question AQO 1946/22-27

Oral question by Mr Tom Buchanan on .

MLA
Mr Tom Buchanan
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
1 May 2025
Type
Oral question
Assembly reference
AQO 1946/22-27
Department
The Executive Office
Business
To the First Minister and deputy First Minister
Assembly identifier
Document 438178

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the First Minister and deputy First Minister for their assessment of the Supreme Court judgment in the case For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers on 16 April 2025.

32 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Follow-ups by the same MLA in the Chamber

These were assessed together with this record:

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.79 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.45).
  • Subject area: Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues.
  • None of the culture-war criteria came close to being met, and the subject matter alone is not enough for it to be flagged.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.23No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.06No
Cultural grievance politics0.08No
Dog-whistle messaging0.29No
Controversy escalation0.28No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.53No
Overall judgement0.79Above flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.45
Reports or questions it0.13
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.42
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.89
No identity-related subject0.08
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.01
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.01
Another identity-related subject0.01

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 08:30 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification