Oral question AQO 298/22-27

Oral question by Mr Danny Donnelly on 11 April 2024.

MLA: Mr Danny Donnelly
Party at the time: Alliance Party
Date: 11 April 2024
Type: Oral question
Assembly reference: AQO 298/22-27
Department: Department of Justice
Business: To the Minister of Justice
Assembly identifier: Document 397074

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Minister of Justice for an update on the introduction of Charlotte’s Law.

15 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Follow-ups by the same MLA in the Chamber

These were assessed together with this record:

22 April 2024 – I thank the Minister for that answer. She will be aware of attacks on healthcare workers. Will she clarify how the Bill…

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.06 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.84).
No identity-based framing was identified (0.98).
The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
Question	Probability	Met?
Identity framing	0.03	No
Sectarian or communal antagonism	0.01	No
Cultural grievance politics	0.02	No
Dog-whistle messaging	0.02	No
Controversy escalation	0.04	No
Legitimate policy scrutiny	0.84	Yes
Overall judgement	0.06	At or below not-flagging threshold

Context and attribution (stance)
Option	Probability
No identity-based framing (chosen)	0.98
Reports or questions it	0.00
Criticises or condemns it	0.01
Adopts it	0.01

Subject area (top five)
Subject	Probability
No identity-related subject	0.84
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues	0.09
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials	0.02
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups	0.02
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism	0.01

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 08:12 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification