Oral question AQO 201/22-27

Oral question by Mr Gary Middleton on 7 March 2024.

MLA: Mr Gary Middleton
Party at the time: Democratic Unionist Party
Date: 7 March 2024
Type: Oral question
Assembly reference: AQO 201/22-27
Department: Northern Ireland Assembly Commission
Business: To the Assembly Commission
Assembly identifier: Document 392905

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Assembly Commission to provide an update on the Northern Ireland Youth Assembly.

15 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Follow-ups by the same MLA in the Chamber

These were assessed together with this record:

19 March 2024 – I thank the Member for her response. I put on record our thanks to the Assembly staff for the fantastic way in which…

Assessment

Not qualifying

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not qualifying”.

Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.03 (qualifying needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not qualifying).
None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.66).
No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
Subject area: Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups.
The overall probability was at or below the not-qualifying threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
Question	Probability	Met?
Identity framing	0.03	No
Sectarian or communal antagonism	0.01	No
Cultural grievance politics	0.02	No
Dog-whistle messaging	0.02	No
Controversy escalation	0.02	No
Legitimate policy scrutiny	0.66	Yes
Overall judgement	0.03	At or below not-qualifying threshold

Context and attribution (stance)
Option	Probability
No identity-based framing (chosen)	1.00
Reports or questions it	0.00
Criticises or condemns it	0.00
Adopts it	0.00

Subject area (top five)
Subject	Probability
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups	0.52
No identity-related subject	0.44
Another identity-related subject	0.02
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues	0.01
Education structures, integration and community division	0.01

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 08:11 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification