Written question AQW 51669/22-27

Written question by Ms Diana Armstrong on .

MLA
Ms Diana Armstrong
Party at the time
Ulster Unionist Party
Date
10 September 2026
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 51669/22-27
Department
Department of Justice
Business
To the Minister of Justice
Assembly identifier
Document 497867

Text

To ask the Minister of Justice, further Public Health Agency's report, Drug Related Intimidation in Northern Ireland: Nature, support needs and how to respond, which found that depleted teams covering larger areas outside Belfast make it difficult to build the community relations on which intelligence gathering depends, to detail the resourcing of neighbourhood policing teams in rural districts.

58 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not qualifying

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not qualifying”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.05 (qualifying needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not qualifying).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.95).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.96).
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-qualifying threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.03No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.02No
Dog-whistle messaging0.03No
Controversy escalation0.03No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.95Yes
Overall judgement0.05At or below not-qualifying threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.96
Reports or questions it0.04
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
No identity-related subject0.75
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.17
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.06
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.02
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 07:43 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification