Written question AQW 51992/22-27

Written question by Ms Cara Hunter on .

MLA
Ms Cara Hunter
Party at the time
Social Democratic and Labour Party
Date
15 September 2026
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 51992/22-27
Department
Department of Education
Business
To the Minister of Education
Assembly identifier
Document 498438

Text

To ask the Minister of Education to detail any reason the Easter Rising of 1916 is not explicitly identified within the proposed Key Stage 3 history curriculum, given that the proposed framework explicitly identifies the Battle of the Somme and the current curriculum requires pupils to investigate the long- and short-term causes and consequences of the partition of Ireland, including key events and turning points.

65 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not qualifying

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not qualifying”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.39 (qualifying needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not qualifying).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.92).
  • Subject area: Education structures, integration and community division.
  • The overall probability was low and the text did not adopt any identity-based framing.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.16No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.59No
Dog-whistle messaging0.12No
Controversy escalation0.43No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.34No
Overall judgement0.39Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.92
Reports or questions it0.06
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.02
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Education structures, integration and community division0.46
No identity-related subject0.17
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.13
Constitutional question, Brexit, the Windsor Framework and sovereignty0.11
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.10

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 07:38 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification