Written question AQW 51731/22-27

Written question by Ms Cara Hunter on .

MLA
Ms Cara Hunter
Party at the time
Social Democratic and Labour Party
Date
11 September 2026
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 51731/22-27
Department
Department of Education
Business
To the Minister of Education
Assembly identifier
Document 497973

Text

To ask the Minister of Education, pursuant of AQW 50839/22-27, whether he will direct his Department to make an assessment of the reasons why transformed schools have subsequently not maintained a balanced community representation, including any steps he will take to address this, in light of his obligation to encourage the development of integrated education.

55 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not qualifying

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not qualifying”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.16 (qualifying needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not qualifying).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.88).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.95).
  • Subject area: Education structures, integration and community division.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-qualifying threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.15No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.08No
Dog-whistle messaging0.03No
Controversy escalation0.10No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.88Yes
Overall judgement0.16At or below not-qualifying threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.95
Reports or questions it0.03
Criticises or condemns it0.01
Adopts it0.01
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Education structures, integration and community division0.98
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.02
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 07:38 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification