Written question AQW 5761/22-27

Written question by Mr Andy Allen MBE on .

MLA
Mr Andy Allen MBE
Party at the time
Ulster Unionist Party
Date
7 February 2024
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 5761/22-27
Department
Department for Communities
Business
To the Minister for Communities
Assembly identifier
Document 387324

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Minister for Communities to detail the number of households on the social housing waiting list (i) with full duty applicant status; (ii) in housing stress; and (iii) with less than thirty housing points, broken down by (a) religion; (b) sex; (c) sexual orientation; (d) age; and (e) household type, as on 1 February, in each of the last five years.

63 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.13 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.90).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.97).
  • Subject area: Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.06No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.01No
Cultural grievance politics0.02No
Dog-whistle messaging0.02No
Controversy escalation0.09No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.90Yes
Overall judgement0.13At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.97
Reports or questions it0.03
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.54
Religion and belief (including people of no religion), churches, faith communities and religious prejudice (including antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice)0.26
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.14
Another identity-related subject0.04
No identity-related subject0.01

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 01:20 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification