Written question AQW 47579/22-27

Written question by Mr Timothy Gaston on .

MLA
Mr Timothy Gaston
Party at the time
Traditional Unionist Voice
Date
1 June 2026
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 47579/22-27
Department
Northern Ireland Assembly Commission
Business
To the Assembly Commission
Assembly identifier
Document 487654

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Assembly Commission why no assessment was undertaken of the implications of the Transgender Policy for women-only spaces within Parliament Buildings, in spite of the issue being flagged during the development of the policy.

36 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.42 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.73).
  • The text adopts the identity-based framing in its own voice (0.51).
  • Subject area: Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues.
  • The overall probability was moderate at most and none of the culture-war criteria was close to being met.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.30No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.04No
Cultural grievance politics0.10No
Dog-whistle messaging0.24No
Controversy escalation0.21No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.73Yes
Overall judgement0.42Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing0.39
Reports or questions it0.10
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it (chosen)0.51
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.95
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.03
Another identity-related subject0.02
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 07:01 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification