Written question AQW 46574/22-27

Written question by Dr Steve Aiken OBE on .

MLA
Dr Steve Aiken OBE
Party at the time
Ulster Unionist Party
Date
19 May 2026
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 46574/22-27
Department
Department for the Economy
Business
To the Minister for the Economy
Assembly identifier
Document 485483

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Minister for the Economy, in light of the Prime Minister's remarks on the 5 May 2026 that there will be zero tolerance for inaction on antisemitism in universities in the United Kingdom, to detail any actions she is taking to ensure universities in Northern Ireland are audited for antisemitism, including any remedial action that will be taken.

60 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.14 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.89).
  • The text criticises or condemns the framing or division (0.71).
  • Subject area: Religion and belief (including people of no religion), churches, faith communities and religious prejudice (including antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice).
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.09No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.11No
Dog-whistle messaging0.04No
Controversy escalation0.11No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.89Yes
Overall judgement0.14At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing0.13
Reports or questions it0.14
Criticises or condemns it (chosen)0.71
Adopts it0.02
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Religion and belief (including people of no religion), churches, faith communities and religious prejudice (including antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice)1.00
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00
Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 06:50 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification