Written question AQW 45309/22-27

Written question by Mr Gerry Carroll on .

MLA
Mr Gerry Carroll
Party at the time
People Before Profit Alliance
Date
1 May 2026
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 45309/22-27
Department
Department of Education
Business
To the Minister of Education
Assembly identifier
Document 482688

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Minister of Education to detail any assessment that has been made of the claims heard in the Court of Appeal that discrimination against catholic school children was baked into the RAISE programme.

35 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.31 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.71).
  • The text reports, quotes or asks about the framing rather than adopting it (0.76).
  • Subject area: Religion and belief (including people of no religion), churches, faith communities and religious prejudice (including antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice).
  • The overall probability was low and the text did not adopt any identity-based framing.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.25No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.03No
Cultural grievance politics0.30No
Dog-whistle messaging0.10No
Controversy escalation0.21No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.71Yes
Overall judgement0.31Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing0.12
Reports or questions it (chosen)0.76
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.12
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Religion and belief (including people of no religion), churches, faith communities and religious prejudice (including antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice)0.74
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.16
Education structures, integration and community division0.10
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 06:41 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification