Written question AQW 4367/22-27

Written question by Mr Paul Frew on .

MLA
Mr Paul Frew
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
10 October 2022
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 4367/22-27
Department
Department of Health
Business
To the Minister of Health
Assembly identifier
Document 383564

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Minister of Health, given Florida Health Officer and Surgeon General’s analysis on Covid 19 vaccines and his findings that mRNA vaccines present an increased risk of cardiac-related death among men aged 18-39, what procedures exist within the Dept of Health to ensure this information is assessed to ensure the public health and safety of the population of Northern Ireland.

62 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.09 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.86).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.88).
  • Subject area: Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.04No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.03No
Cultural grievance politics0.01No
Dog-whistle messaging0.04No
Controversy escalation0.04No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.86Yes
Overall judgement0.09At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.88
Reports or questions it0.02
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.10
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.74
No identity-related subject0.25
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.01
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 17:49 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification