Written question AQW 38253/22-27

Written question by Mr Timothy Gaston on .

MLA
Mr Timothy Gaston
Party at the time
Traditional Unionist Voice
Date
14 January 2026
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 38253/22-27
Department
The Executive Office
Business
To the First Minister and deputy First Minister
Assembly identifier
Document 466314

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the First Minister and deputy First Minister to detail all groups which include transwomen that received funding under the Strategic Framework to End Violence against Women and Girls, broken down by the amount awarded in each case.

39 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.42 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.70).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.86).
  • Subject area: Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues.
  • The overall probability was low and the text did not adopt any identity-based framing.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.10No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.04No
Cultural grievance politics0.06No
Dog-whistle messaging0.13No
Controversy escalation0.31No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.70Yes
Overall judgement0.42Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.86
Reports or questions it0.06
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.08
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.90
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.08
Another identity-related subject0.02
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 05:30 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification