Written question AQW 36928/22-27

Written question by Ms Kellie Armstrong on .

MLA
Ms Kellie Armstrong
Party at the time
Alliance Party
Date
5 December 2025
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 36928/22-27
Department
Department for Communities
Business
To the Minister for Communities
Assembly identifier
Document 462716

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Minister for Communities to detail (i) his assessment of the Participation and the Practice of Rights policy brief, published on 1 December 2025, on the Fundamental Review of Allocations of Social Housing; and (ii) how he will ensure this is taken into consideration the Housing Executive in its review of the points system.

56 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.07 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.91).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.04No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.01No
Cultural grievance politics0.03No
Dog-whistle messaging0.02No
Controversy escalation0.04No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.91Yes
Overall judgement0.07At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)1.00
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
No identity-related subject0.86
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.05
Disability (including neurodivergence and mental health), disabled people and disability or sickness benefits0.03
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.02
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.02

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 05:17 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification