Written question AQW 36781/22-27
Written question by Mr Timothy Gaston on .
- MLA
- Mr Timothy Gaston
- Party at the time
- Traditional Unionist Voice
- Date
- 3 December 2025
- Type
- Written question
- Assembly reference
- AQW 36781/22-27
- Department
- Department of Health
- Business
- To the Minister of Health
- Assembly identifier
- Document 462327
Read the official Assembly record Open Data source
Text
To ask the Minister of Health when he was provided with a draft answer from officials to (i) AQW 32562/22-27; (ii) AQW 32207/22-27; (iii) AQW 32206/22-27; (iv) AQW 32204/22-27; (v) AQW 32203/22-27; (vi) AQW 31196/22-27; (vii) AQW 30169/22-27; (viii) AQW 28799/22-27; (ix) AQW 28374/22-27; (x) AQW 26240/22-27; (xi) AQW 26238/22-27; (xii) AQW 25781/22-27; (xiii) AQW 25780/22-27; (xiv) AQW 25779/22-27; (xv) AQW 24136/22-27; (xvi) AQW 23074/22-27; (xvii) AQW 21508/22-27; (xiii) AQW 21507/22-27; (xix) AQW 21506/22-27; (xx) AQW 20027/22-27; (xxi) AQW 19865/22-27; (xxii) AQW 18946/22-27; (xxiii) AQW 18779/22-27; (xxiv) AQW 17317/22-27; (xxv) AQW 16967/22-27; (xxvi) AQW 15665/22-27; (xxvii) AQW 15481/22-27; (xxviii) AQW 14969/22-27; (xxix) AQW 14872/22-27; and (xxx) AQW 14534/22-27; and when he will answer these questions.
115 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.05 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
- None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
- No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
- The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.02 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.02 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.02 | No |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.02 | No |
| Controversy escalation | 0.03 | No |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.27 | No |
| Overall judgement | 0.05 | At or below not-flagging threshold |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing (chosen) | 1.00 |
| Reports or questions it | 0.00 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.00 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-related subject | 1.00 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.00 |
| Parades, bonfires and commemorations | 0.00 |
| Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy | 0.00 |
| Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 05:17 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.