Written question AQW 36165/22-27
Written question by Mr Colm Gildernew on .
- MLA
- Mr Colm Gildernew
- Party at the time
- Sinn Féin
- Date
- 24 November 2025
- Type
- Written question
- Assembly reference
- AQW 36165/22-27
- Department
- Department for Communities
- Business
- To the Minister for Communities
- Assembly identifier
- Document 460844
Read the official Assembly record Open Data source
Text
To ask the Minister for Communities to detail the number of staff within his Department who were tasked with removing Irish and Ulster Scots from the departmental logo.
28 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Assessment
Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy
Decided as qualifying on a second assessment, because Jev’s answers did not settle it. The reasons are given below.
- Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.64 (qualifying needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not qualifying).
- Criteria met: Cultural grievance politics (0.84); Dog-whistle messaging (0.61); Controversy escalation (0.79).
- The text reports, quotes or asks about the framing rather than adopting it (0.44).
- Subject area: Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy.
- The answers did not meet either automatic threshold.
This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.
Second assessment
Jev’s answers did not settle this record, so a second model, claude-opus-5-5, read the same text (without the MLA’s name or party) and gave its reasons on 21 October 2026. How the second assessment works
- Verdict
- Qualifying
- Public interest or divisiveness
- Mixed
Against the published rubric
The question does not ask about cost, legal duties or how the department's language policy works. It asks how many staff were "tasked with removing Irish and Ulster Scots from the departmental logo", a figure that serves no decision the Assembly or department has to make. Its evident function is to put an objection to the removal of both languages from shared branding on the record, and to cast the change as a deliberate, resourced act of erasure. This continues a recognised flashpoint over language visibility, so the central point is a symbolic grievance rather than practical scrutiny.
Public interest or divisiveness
There is a legitimate public interest in scrutinising a ministerial decision to change how a department presents itself, and the question is neutrally worded and objects on behalf of both Irish and Ulster-Scots rather than attacking any group. However, asking for a headcount of staff involved functions mainly to embarrass and to keep the dispute over the languages' place in public branding going. A mirror-image question about staff tasked with adding a language would be read the same way, so both elements are substantial.
Jev’s structured answers
| Question | Probability | Met? |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | 0.43 | No |
| Sectarian or communal antagonism | 0.07 | No |
| Cultural grievance politics | 0.84 | Yes |
| Dog-whistle messaging | 0.61 | Yes |
| Controversy escalation | 0.79 | Yes |
| Legitimate policy scrutiny | 0.22 | No |
| Overall judgement | 0.64 | Between thresholds |
| Option | Probability |
|---|---|
| No identity-based framing | 0.16 |
| Reports or questions it (chosen) | 0.44 |
| Criticises or condemns it | 0.00 |
| Adopts it | 0.40 |
| Subject | Probability |
|---|---|
| Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy | 0.92 |
| Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials | 0.08 |
| No identity-related subject | 0.00 |
| Parades, bonfires and commemorations | 0.00 |
| Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies | 0.00 |
Assessed 21 October 2026 at 05:11 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.
Disagree with this assessment?
Classifications can be challenged. A person reviews every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.