Written question AQW 34613/22-27

Written question by Ms Paula Bradshaw on .

MLA
Ms Paula Bradshaw
Party at the time
Alliance Party
Date
4 November 2025
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 34613/22-27
Department
The Executive Office
Business
To the First Minister and deputy First Minister
Assembly identifier
Document 457467

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the First Minister and deputy First Minister to detail any steps being taken to ensure that the work of the Northern Ireland Bureau in China aligns with the Executive’s human rights obligations, including in relation to reports of religious and ethnic persecution.

44 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.12 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.85).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.60).
  • Subject area: Religion and belief (including people of no religion), churches, faith communities and religious prejudice (including antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice).
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.06No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.04No
Dog-whistle messaging0.03No
Controversy escalation0.10No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.85Yes
Overall judgement0.12At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.60
Reports or questions it0.37
Criticises or condemns it0.02
Adopts it0.01
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Religion and belief (including people of no religion), churches, faith communities and religious prejudice (including antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice)0.68
Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers0.22
Another identity-related subject0.08
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.01
No identity-related subject0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 05:02 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification