Written question AQW 33854/22-27

Written question by Mr Timothy Gaston on .

MLA
Mr Timothy Gaston
Party at the time
Traditional Unionist Voice
Date
17 October 2025
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 33854/22-27
Department
Department for the Economy
Business
To the Minister for the Economy
Assembly identifier
Document 455476

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Minister for the Economy (i) whether the new Ethical Investment Framework risks creating a bias against Israel; and (ii) how her Department will ensure that companies are not unfairly penalised for engaging with Israeli partners.

38 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.25 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.68).
  • The text reports, quotes or asks about the framing rather than adopting it (0.36).
  • Subject area: Religion and belief (including people of no religion), churches, faith communities and religious prejudice (including antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice).
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.20No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.03No
Cultural grievance politics0.07No
Dog-whistle messaging0.17No
Controversy escalation0.20No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.68Yes
Overall judgement0.25At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing0.28
Reports or questions it (chosen)0.36
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.36
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Religion and belief (including people of no religion), churches, faith communities and religious prejudice (including antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice)0.33
Another identity-related subject0.31
No identity-related subject0.28
Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers0.05
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.01

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 04:43 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification