Written question AQW 32559/22-27

Written question by Mr Timothy Gaston on .

MLA
Mr Timothy Gaston
Party at the time
Traditional Unionist Voice
Date
1 October 2025
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 32559/22-27
Department
Department of Education
Business
To the Minister of Education
Assembly identifier
Document 452493

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Minister of Education to detail any contact he has had with the Education Authority, seeking the withdrawal of their guidance on transgender pupils since the Supreme Court judgement in the case of For Women Scotland versus The Scottish Ministers.

42 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.49 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.70).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.48).
  • Subject area: Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues.
  • The overall probability was low and the text did not adopt any identity-based framing.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.14No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.03No
Cultural grievance politics0.07No
Dog-whistle messaging0.21No
Controversy escalation0.30No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.70Yes
Overall judgement0.49Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.48
Reports or questions it0.22
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.30
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.98
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.01
Another identity-related subject0.01
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 04:31 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification