Written question AQW 30604/22-27

Written question by Miss Deirdre Hargey on .

MLA
Miss Deirdre Hargey
Party at the time
Sinn Féin
Date
8 September 2025
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 30604/22-27
Department
Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs
Business
To the Minister of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs
Assembly identifier
Document 448492

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (i) for an update on the removal of asbestos and other toxic materials located on the site of the recent bonfire at Meridi Street in South Belfast; (ii) to detail the timeframe for its removal; (iii) to detail who has direct responsibility for its removal.; and (iv) for an update on the ongoing investigation.

64 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.12 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.88).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.97).
  • Subject area: Parades, bonfires and commemorations.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.03No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.06No
Dog-whistle messaging0.05No
Controversy escalation0.10No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.88Yes
Overall judgement0.12At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.97
Reports or questions it0.03
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.84
No identity-related subject0.16
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy0.00
Sport (including the GAA), the arts and cultural bodies0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 04:16 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification