Written question AQW 30772/22-27

Written question by Mr David Brooks on .

MLA
Mr David Brooks
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
10 September 2025
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 30772/22-27
Department
Department for Communities
Business
To the Minister for Communities
Assembly identifier
Document 448789

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Minister for Communities to detail whether single males leaving Mears accommodation who have been successfully granted permission to stay in the UK by the Home Office are classed as being in priority need by the Housing Executive.

40 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.15 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.88).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.98).
  • Subject area: Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.06No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.03No
Cultural grievance politics0.01No
Dog-whistle messaging0.12No
Controversy escalation0.05No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.88Yes
Overall judgement0.15At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.98
Reports or questions it0.01
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.01
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers0.86
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.11
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.02
No identity-related subject0.01
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 04:15 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification