Written question AQW 30241/22-27

Written question by Ms Kellie Armstrong on .

MLA
Ms Kellie Armstrong
Party at the time
Alliance Party
Date
3 September 2025
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 30241/22-27
Department
Department for Communities
Business
To the Minister for Communities
Assembly identifier
Document 447985

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Minister for Communities to detail (i) the number of politicians from the United States of America who have received funding form his Department for genealogy and lineage research in the past 10 years; and (a) the name of each USA politician whose genealogy was researched, (b) the amount spent for each piece of research, (c) when it was published; and (d) where it can be accessed by the public.

72 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.16 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.99).
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.03No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.03No
Cultural grievance politics0.03No
Dog-whistle messaging0.10No
Controversy escalation0.26No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.33No
Overall judgement0.16At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.99
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.01
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
No identity-related subject0.68
Another identity-related subject0.20
Immigration, asylum, race, ethnicity and Travellers0.07
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.04
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.01

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 04:12 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification