Written question AQW 29755/22-27

Written question by Dr Steve Aiken OBE on .

MLA
Dr Steve Aiken OBE
Party at the time
Ulster Unionist Party
Date
2 July 2025
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 29755/22-27
Department
Department for Communities
Business
To the Minister for Communities
Assembly identifier
Document 445641

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Minister for Communities, in light of its funding of the publication Comhar, whose front cover of its July 2025 has been condemned by the Jewish community as being antisemitic, to detail any plans to refer Foras na Gaeilge to be investigated by the Northern Ireland Public Services Ombudsman to ensure that it does not support antisemitism.

59 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.45 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.62).
  • The text criticises or condemns the framing or division (0.79).
  • Subject area: Religion and belief (including people of no religion), churches, faith communities and religious prejudice (including antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice).
  • The overall probability was low and the text did not adopt any identity-based framing.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.31No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.04No
Cultural grievance politics0.51No
Dog-whistle messaging0.20No
Controversy escalation0.59No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.62Yes
Overall judgement0.45Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing0.02
Reports or questions it0.14
Criticises or condemns it (chosen)0.79
Adopts it0.05
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Religion and belief (including people of no religion), churches, faith communities and religious prejudice (including antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice)1.00
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00
Irish language, Ulster-Scots and language policy0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 04:06 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification