Written question AQW 28830/22-27

Written question by Ms Cara Hunter on .

MLA
Ms Cara Hunter
Party at the time
Social Democratic and Labour Party
Date
17 June 2025
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 28830/22-27
Department
Department of Justice
Business
To the Minister of Justice
Assembly identifier
Document 443645

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Minister of Justice for her assessment of Lord Alderdice's comments in relation to loyalist paramilitary transitioning when he said that there comes a point when you have to say no this hasn't been delivered, it's not going to be delivered and actually by continuing we are making it worse.

52 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.27 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • The text reports, quotes or asks about the framing rather than adopting it (0.57).
  • Subject area: Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.15No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.03No
Cultural grievance politics0.04No
Dog-whistle messaging0.08No
Controversy escalation0.17No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.55No
Overall judgement0.27At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing0.39
Reports or questions it (chosen)0.57
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.04
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.95
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.03
No identity-related subject0.02
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 04:02 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification