Written question AQW 28873/22-27

Written question by Ms Diana Armstrong on .

MLA
Ms Diana Armstrong
Party at the time
Ulster Unionist Party
Date
17 June 2025
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 28873/22-27
Department
Department of Education
Business
To the Minister of Education
Assembly identifier
Document 443688

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Minister of Education (i) to outline what plans are in place for repurposing Lack Primary School once the current school term ends; and (ii) to provide assurances to the local community that this building will not be left to fall into dereliction like St Mary’s Brollagh, Belleek and the former Duke of Westminster School, Kesh.

58 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.07 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.89).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (1.00).
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.03No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.02No
Dog-whistle messaging0.03No
Controversy escalation0.05No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.89Yes
Overall judgement0.07At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)1.00
Reports or questions it0.00
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
No identity-related subject0.66
Education structures, integration and community division0.27
Religion and belief (including people of no religion), churches, faith communities and religious prejudice (including antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice)0.05
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.01
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.01

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 04:01 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification