Written question AQW 24987/22-27

Written question by Ms Cara Hunter on .

MLA
Ms Cara Hunter
Party at the time
Social Democratic and Labour Party
Date
25 March 2025
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 24987/22-27
Department
Department of Justice
Business
To the Minister of Justice
Assembly identifier
Document 434087

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Minister of Justice, following the recommendations in the Committee on the Administration of Justice report Policing the Protectors: A Narrative Report of PSNI Policing of Environmental Protest in the Sperrins, whether she will be advancing the recommendations for the PSNI to ensure officers engaged in the policing of protests receive adequate training on the human rights and the rights to protest in such circumstances.

67 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.09 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.93).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.99).
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.04No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.03No
Dog-whistle messaging0.03No
Controversy escalation0.07No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.93Yes
Overall judgement0.09At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.99
Reports or questions it0.01
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
No identity-related subject0.91
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.03
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.03
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.02
Another identity-related subject0.01

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 03:27 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification