Written question AQW 24674/22-27

Written question by Mr Doug Beattie MC on .

MLA
Mr Doug Beattie MC
Party at the time
Ulster Unionist Party
Date
20 March 2025
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 24674/22-27
Department
Department of Health
Business
To the Minister of Health
Assembly identifier
Document 433291

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Minister of Health (i) whether his Department will implement the recommendations of the Independent Report on the Review of Data, Statistics and Research on Sex and Gender; and (ii) whether he will ensure any public consultations will register biological sex.

43 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.47 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.67).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.53).
  • Subject area: Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues.
  • The overall probability was moderate at most and none of the culture-war criteria was close to being met.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.19No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.03No
Cultural grievance politics0.14No
Dog-whistle messaging0.26No
Controversy escalation0.30No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.67Yes
Overall judgement0.47Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.53
Reports or questions it0.08
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.39
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.95
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.05
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 03:26 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification