Written question AQW 24131/22-27

Written question by Mr Peter Martin on .

MLA
Mr Peter Martin
Party at the time
Democratic Unionist Party
Date
10 March 2025
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 24131/22-27
Department
Department of Health
Business
To the Minister of Health
Assembly identifier
Document 431847

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Minister of Health to detail the consultation that each Health and Social Care Trust took with staff before allowing transgender or non-binary staff to use toilets, showers and changing rooms that are not the sex assigned to them at birth.

43 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.54 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.69).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.79).
  • Subject area: Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues.
  • The overall probability was moderate at most and none of the culture-war criteria was close to being met.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.14No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.09No
Cultural grievance politics0.06No
Dog-whistle messaging0.29No
Controversy escalation0.33No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.69Yes
Overall judgement0.54Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.79
Reports or questions it0.11
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.10
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.98
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.01
Another identity-related subject0.01
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 03:21 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification