Written question AQW 23572/22-27

Written question by Mr Doug Beattie MC on .

MLA
Mr Doug Beattie MC
Party at the time
Ulster Unionist Party
Date
28 February 2025
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 23572/22-27
Department
Department of Justice
Business
To the Minister of Justice
Assembly identifier
Document 430368

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Minister of Justice, pursuant to AQW 22976/22-27, to detail (i) whether terrorists and members of paramilitary organisations, who have past convictions for sexual violence or child abuse as part of the legacy of our troubles, are able to avail of Communities in Transition funding; (ii) how her Department keeps a record of this; and (i) how her Department warns other agencies of past convictions.

67 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.31 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.83).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.78).
  • Subject area: Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism.
  • The overall probability was low and the text did not adopt any identity-based framing.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.07No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.09No
Cultural grievance politics0.03No
Dog-whistle messaging0.26No
Controversy escalation0.11No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.83Yes
Overall judgement0.31Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.78
Reports or questions it0.07
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.15
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.95
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.02
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.02
No identity-related subject0.01
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 03:17 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification