Written question AQW 21188/22-27

Written question by Mr Doug Beattie MC on .

MLA
Mr Doug Beattie MC
Party at the time
Ulster Unionist Party
Date
23 January 2025
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 21188/22-27
Department
Department of Justice
Business
To the Minister of Justice
Assembly identifier
Document 424891

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Minister of Justice, in relation to any case where an individual identifies as a transgender female while already on remand, whether (i) that individual will be afforded the same rights as those committed to prison who already identify as transgender; and (ii) that individual will be able to attend their trial in the identity they are espousing.

60 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.17 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.90).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.96).
  • Subject area: Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.11No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.04No
Dog-whistle messaging0.12No
Controversy escalation0.13No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.90Yes
Overall judgement0.17At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.96
Reports or questions it0.03
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.01
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.96
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.02
Another identity-related subject0.02
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 02:51 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification