Written question AQW 20773/22-27

Written question by Mr Gerry Carroll on .

MLA
Mr Gerry Carroll
Party at the time
People Before Profit Alliance
Date
17 January 2025
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 20773/22-27
Department
Department of Justice
Business
To the Minister of Justice
Assembly identifier
Document 424097

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the Minister of Justice (i) to detail the number of occasions that Attenuating Energy Projectiles were used by the PSNI in situations of public disorder involving young people in 2024; and (ii) for her assessment of the use of Attenuating Energy Projectiles in situations of public disorder involving young people.

52 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.16 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.88).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.99).
  • Subject area: Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.04No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.02No
Cultural grievance politics0.02No
Dog-whistle messaging0.05No
Controversy escalation0.07No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.88Yes
Overall judgement0.16At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.99
Reports or questions it0.01
Criticises or condemns it0.00
Adopts it0.00
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.50
No identity-related subject0.43
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.04
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.01
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.01

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 02:47 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification