Written question AQW 18100/22-27

Written question by Mr Timothy Gaston on .

MLA
Mr Timothy Gaston
Party at the time
Traditional Unionist Voice
Date
12 November 2024
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 18100/22-27
Department
The Executive Office
Business
To the First Minister and deputy First Minister
Assembly identifier
Document 417528

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the First Minister and deputy First Minister, given their Department's responsibility for representing the interests of victims, why they did not issue a statement of condemnation following pro-IRA shouting at a memorial event to mark the 1987 Remembrance Day bombing in Enniskillen.

44 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.46 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • The text criticises or condemns the framing or division (0.54).
  • Subject area: Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism.
  • The overall probability was low and the text did not adopt any identity-based framing.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.47No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.04No
Cultural grievance politics0.48No
Dog-whistle messaging0.20No
Controversy escalation0.40No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.35No
Overall judgement0.46Between thresholds
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing0.22
Reports or questions it0.12
Criticises or condemns it (chosen)0.54
Adopts it0.12
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.99
Sectarianism, hate crime and community relations0.01
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00
Parades, bonfires and commemorations0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 02:23 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification