Written question AQW 16125/22-27

Written question by Mr Timothy Gaston on .

MLA
Mr Timothy Gaston
Party at the time
Traditional Unionist Voice
Date
2 October 2024
Type
Written question
Assembly reference
AQW 16125/22-27
Department
The Executive Office
Business
To the First Minister and deputy First Minister
Assembly identifier
Document 412550

Read the official Assembly record Open Data source

Text

To ask the First Minister and deputy First Minister, in light of their statutory obligation to represent the interests of victims, for their assessment of the victims’ accounts of the role of the IRA in the abuse of women and girls, as highlighted in the Research Report 2024, When you know what they are capable of: Paramilitary-related Gendered Coercive Control.

60 words. Text as published by the Northern Ireland Assembly.

Assessment

Not flagged

Jev’s structured answers met the documented threshold for “not flagged”.

  • Overall probability that the activity is being used to promote, exploit or escalate an identity-based controversy: 0.21 (flagging needs at least 0.70; at or below 0.30 is not flagged).
  • None of the five culture-war criteria was met (each was below 0.60).
  • Assessed as legitimate policy scrutiny (0.74).
  • No identity-based framing was identified (0.65).
  • Subject area: Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism.
  • The overall probability was at or below the not-flagging threshold.

This is an AI-generated assessment of the text, made against published criteria. It is not a finding of fact about the MLA or their intentions. The Assembly record itself is the fact.

Jev’s structured answers

Probability that each statement is true of this text (0 = no, 1 = yes). A criterion counts as met at 0.60 or above.
QuestionProbabilityMet?
Identity framing0.11No
Sectarian or communal antagonism0.04No
Cultural grievance politics0.03No
Dog-whistle messaging0.07No
Controversy escalation0.11No
Legitimate policy scrutiny0.74Yes
Overall judgement0.21At or below not-flagging threshold
Context and attribution (stance)
OptionProbability
No identity-based framing (chosen)0.65
Reports or questions it0.25
Criticises or condemns it0.01
Adopts it0.09
Subject area (top five)
SubjectProbability
Legacy of the Troubles, victims and paramilitarism0.75
Sexism, misogyny, ageism and other equality groups0.18
Gender, sexuality, abortion and related social issues0.07
No identity-related subject0.00
Flags, emblems, symbols, names and memorials0.00

Assessed 21 October 2026 at 02:06 UTC by jev-1.13.0 (requested as typesafe/jev) under rubric 2026.10-r9, methodology 1.9.

Disagree with this assessment?

Classifications can be challenged. A person reads every challenge, and any change is recorded publicly above with its reason.

Challenge this classification